Home » Racing & Sport » News » Byleveld: NHA Eat Slice Of Humble Pie

Byleveld: NHA Eat Slice Of Humble Pie

Legal threat from CJA

The National Horseracing Authority have issued a correction to a published finding on a jockey having entered a betting outlet without permission, after legal counsel for the Coastal Jockeys Association demanded that the matter be reviewed.

MJ Byleveld - Movember Week 2

Avontuur’s MJ Byleveld – victim of NHA indiscretion

Cape jockey MJ Byleveld, who was issued with a warning for an infringement of rule 21.3, after he had failed to obtain Stipes permission for having participated in a Met panel discussion in a Betting World branch, has had a more detailed version of the finding published in this week’s NHA calendar.

Headed ‘Correction’ and dated 3 February, the insert states:

M J Byleveld (Jockey) – Rule 21.3 – Having participated in a televised Panel discussion at the request of the Racing Operator, but for failing to obtain the written permission of the Stipendiary Board, to enter or visit any registered betting premises where members of the public are able to place any bets or wagers of any kind whatsoever. Fined: Warning.

Read the calendar here

The ludicrous aspect of Byleveld’s original charge was that he had been invited by a member of the Phumelela executive and had thus, reasonably one would feel, assumed that all was in order.

The lack of discretion shown by the Stipes has been the subject of much debate. The very spirit of the intention of the original rule – that jockeys avoid betting outlets to reduce the negative public perception that could arise – did not look to have been broken. Byleveld attended the function together with well-known racing personalities, as an invited guest and without remuneration.

We reported on 2 March that the Coastal Jockeys Association had instructed their lawyers to inform the NHA that none of their members would be party to any future panel discussions on any racecourse or betting premise. That was the mandate until such time as Racing Executive Arnold Hyde issued an apology for embarrassing Byleveld and also gave an undertaking in regard to jockeys attending similar events in future.

Read the full background here

While Byleveld will take some heart that his good name has been cleared, his disciplinary record will reflect the charge.

We were unable to determine whether the requested apology was forthcoming and how the NHA intend dealing with these alleged breaches of rules in future.

Surely there  are bigger and more pressing issues facing the racing regulator?

Have Your Say

Comments Policy
The Sporting Post encourages everyone to feel free to comment in the spirit of enlightening the topic being discussed, to add opinions or correct errors. All posts are accepted on the condition that The Sporting Post can at any time alter, correct or remove comments, either partially or entirely.

All posters are required to post under their real and verified names, you can adjust your display name on your account page or to send corrections privately to the Editor. The Sporting Post will not publish comments submitted anonymously or under pseudonyms.

The views of any individuals that are published are NOT necessarily the views of The Sporting Post.

8 comments on “Byleveld: NHA Eat Slice Of Humble Pie

  1. Michael Jacobs says:

    That’s what happens when you have amateurs running the show. We need people who understand racing to be in charge , people who can see the bigger picture. Common sense would also be a useful skill.

  2. Pieta says:

    They had to come up with something……they only realized afterwards that they were biting the hand that feeds them…but as usual nothing will happen…sadly.

  3. Pieta says:

    Is Mr Basel in the country?….Maybe he can give us his thoughts?

  4. Ian Jayes says:

    Storm in a teacup. If only the NHA stuck to the letter of the law in other respects.

  5. Garth Miller says:

    What recourse is there to sanction the people responsible for maliciously blotting the copy book of MJ Beleveld . An apology is not enough. I believe that those responsible should be relieved of their positions.
    They, singularly , have brought racing into disrepute. Shame on you.

  6. Preston says:

    Did the jockey enter a prohibited betting place without written permission? The answer is binary , yes.
    For infringement of that written law , he then needs to be sanctioned.There is nothing malicious in the
    application of the law.

  7. Brian says:

    Preston, absolutely wrong. IT WAS! And petty!

    1. Preston says:

      Brain, I am not sure , I understand your response.Please eloborate.

Leave a Comment

‹ Previous

Power Players Out Today

Next ›

Kotzen’s Sweet Travel Plans

Popular Posts