Home » Racing & Sport » News » ‘Grooms Could Be The Losers’- De Kock

‘Grooms Could Be The Losers’- De Kock

Raceday transport poser for Phumelela

Pressing issues of minimum wages, accommodation and raceday transport appear to be at the core of an Economic Freedom Fighter’s led strike by Randjesfontein – based Grooms, which disrupted the Turffontein racemeeting on Sunday.

The apparently wildcat strike led to the loss of close on fifty runners and the cancellation of the day’s feature.

Besides being disruptive for stakeholders, the loss of runners impacts heavily on profitability for Phumelela, with betting turnover suffering as a result of smaller fields.

While official comment was not forthcoming, the Sporting Post has learnt that,  besides the dissatisfaction over wages and accommodation, the Gauteng traffic authorities have been treating the raceday transport as trailers and not permissible for human carriage.

This means that the transporter is incurring fines when illegally transporting Grooms with the horses. This is naturally also a serious safety consideration for the Grooms.

Mike de Kock and his staff – a file pic

Champion trainer Mike de Kock, an acknowledged industry leader in staff training, with an established and loyal work-force, said on www.mikedekockracing.com: “There are between 300-400 strikers. We can’t get in or out of the centre, all access is blocked and all the Randjesfontein runners will have to be scratched. I’m not sure it’s worthwhile continuing with racing at all as betting pools will be decimated.

“This appears to be a wildcat strike. There hasn’t been any negotiation so far, though there have been what sounds like valid complaints including labour-related issues.

Phumelela“Phumelela’s mode of transport has also been mentioned. When horses are transported to races the grooms do not want to stand with the horses inside the floats which may well be a valid concern too.”

“The sad reality is that grooms will be the losers here. This is not a legitimate strike, they have done it in a disorderly fashion and it may well cost them their jobs and income.

“It is also unfortunate that the trainers like myself who do our best and go out of our way to comply and treat our grooms very well, have to suffer because a small minority of trainers that don’t comply.”

Have Your Say

Comments Policy
The Sporting Post encourages allcomers to feel free to have their say in the spirit of enlightening the topic, the participants and the originator of the thread. However, if it is deemed to be either offensive, insulting, personal, false or possibly unsubstantiated, the Sporting Post shall, on it's own assessment, alter or remove comments.

The use of pseudonyms is permitted by posters to afford everybody the equal opportunity to inform or express ideas, on condition that the content of any post does not infringe upon any aspect, stated or implied, of the Sporting Post's advertised public comments policy.

It should be expressly noted that the views expressed by posters are not necessarily those of the Sporting Post.

4 comments on “‘Grooms Could Be The Losers’- De Kock

  1. Ian Jayes says:

    What right did the EFF have to come onto private property to stir up emotions and cause disruption? Wages and working conditions can be negotiated in an orderly fashion around a table. This looks like pure politicking ahead of the 2019 General Election and the EFF has clearly overstepped the mark.

  2. Rian says:

    How well is very well treated and comply with what??????
    How many is the small minority and name and shame them……
    How much do grooms get paid????
    How many hours do they work a day?? week?? month ?????
    How many grooms sleep on THE PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH FAMILY AND CHILDREN????
    The Grooms are extremely important in a Horses racing life and should be treated accordingly

  3. Blue Peter says:

    This is the begining of the end. They are into trainers and jockeys next. Our black jockeys are not getting support from the stables. Treated as workriders. Disgraceful in my view. The meeting should have been abondened. The punter got screwed.

  4. valerie delport says:

    PLEASE ADVISE IS EFF A POLITICAL PARTY OR PART OF A WORKERS UNION / BARGAINING COUNCIL? IS THIS MATTER NOT LABOUR RELATED?

Leave a Comment

‹ Previous

Lazy Apprentices Slammed

Next ›

Igugu Half-Sister’s July Shares Rise

Popular Posts