Home » Racing & Sport » Opinion » Why No Open Cards, Larry?

Why No Open Cards, Larry?

Omission of obvious nominee irks owners and breeders

It’s a thankless task sitting on awards panels.

In a competitive industry, everybody’s horse is the champion and subjectivity often rules. Nothing beats receiving deserved recognition and accolades from one’s peers.

But the puzzling no show of the Yvette Bremner-trained National Park from the nominee list of the Champion 2yo male category for the regional East Cape Racing Awards published by the Racing Association late last week had the owners of the son of Gimmethegreenlight sitting up and asking questions – how and why?

There is little doubt  that the first nominee Alfeo would be a deserved winner of the category.

The MR 94-rated galloper has won 3 of his 6 starts, including a stakes feature. He finished some 15 lengths back in the Champion Juvenile Cup.

The next nominee Say No More was 18,6 lengths back in the same feature. He has an 83 rating and has  a record of 1 win in 7 starts.

The third nominee Born A Bully won his first start – the first local 2yo event over 800m. That was his sole win in eight starts. He was 16,6 lengths back in the Champion Juvenile Cup. He is rated 78.

The question is –  how and why no place for the narrow runner-up in the Champion Juvenile Cup and the highest rated (96) of the crop, National Park? Can his omission be justified?

A winner of 2 of his 5 starts, National Park won the Champion Juvenile Cup beating likely champion 2yo filly of last term, Madame Speaker. He lost the race in the Stipes Boardroom after a successful objection by the runner-up.

Madame Speaker (Greg Cheyne) down the inside fights it out with National Park (Ryan Munger) in a thriller that ended up in the Stipes Boardroom (Pic – Pauline Herman Photography)

So a two-time winning MR 96 rated narrow loser of the Champion Juvenile Cup, doesn’t even get a nomination nod ahead of two one-time winners (rated 78 & 83), who finished a collective 35 lengths behind him in the Listed Champion Juvenile Cup – a race often used as a benchmark of the 2yo crop over the years.

The judging panel is comprised of  Thulani Khanyile (Convenor), Dr Ashley Parker, Trevor Reid, Mathew Lips and Henk Steenkamp.

The owners and breeders of National Park are outraged.

Not about the fact that Alfeo would be a deserving winner. They are tired of the fact that the sport they are so passionate about and have invested many millions of rands in over decades is run by people, many of whom have been in it for five minutes, who have no interest in the well-being of the game and the preservation of the tradition, ethics and ethos.

Thulani Khanyile – at the centre of the storm?

“This is a matter of principle for us. Four of the panel members are knowledgeable and experienced people. Our horse is clearly a candidate for a nomination. Yet two, with respect, inferior horses get nominated. We suggest that the Convenor of the panel has exceeded his authority and used the occasion of an important event for the industry to wage a personal vendetta. We suggest that his competency to convene this panel is in serious doubt. We cannot let this action pass unnoticed as it is an indictment of the broader level of personal egotism at play in the industry in certain quarters,” said owners / breeders Rob Knuppe, Hedley McGrath and Mark Wright in a joint statement.

“The Racing Association, and by implication their awards committee, are allowing any goodwill left in the industry to be destroyed through glossing over this matter. It was brought to the RA’s CEO attention and he ‘relented’ and agreed to include National Park. We are not seeking a favour, hollow victory and concession – or a sympathy ticket. We are simply looking for the truth as to what happened  and would like the individual members of the committee to stand up and be counted.”

Larry Wainstein

Larry Wainstein – no response

The Sporting Post emailed Larry Wainstein and Thulani Khanyile and gave them an opportunity to respond to the owners.

No reply was forthcoming.

A simple logic of damage control suggests there was a better way to deal with whatever happened here. It starts with humility and doesn’t end with playing hardball with longstanding owners and breeders – or shunning the simple media enquiries. You might think you’re the boss – but who is paying your salary?

This blip on our everyday radar may appear trivial to some. But add the logic applied to the selection of the nominees with the collective years of involvement and investment by the owners of National Park, and think again.

“This situation is unacceptable and must be urgently addressed before there is a mass exodus of owners and breeders from the Thoroughbred Industry. Any tin-pot dictators, given free rein, will simply encourage the speed of the exodus,” said the aggrieved connections in closing.

Click on the image below to read more in the latest SP Digest

Have Your Say

Comments Policy
The Sporting Post encourages allcomers to feel free to have their say in the spirit of enlightening the topic, the participants and the originator of the thread. However, if it is deemed to be either offensive, insulting, personal, false or possibly unsubstantiated, the Sporting Post shall, on it's own assessment, alter or remove comments.

7 comments on “Why No Open Cards, Larry?

  1. Animal Love says:

    Well done to the Sporting Post for pointing out the real troublemaker. The panel should have been chosen by the directors of the RA and not him. If Larry Weinstein had any real understanding of what is right, he should not have used employees of the NHRA to be on the panel. The whole system needs an overhaul. Truly independent and knowlegeable people should be asked to be the judges.There are many who can do it. These spring to mind. Ex stipes, Ex handicappers, Charles Faul, Karel Mediema and the Ringer. I am very worried about the NHRA management allowing its staff to be involved in horseracing endeavours that are not NHRA business. The independence and impartiality of the NHRA is becoming questionable. The problems with the RA are already in plain sight.

  2. Steve says:

    BEEN THERE!!!!

  3. Ian Jayes says:

    You know the dictum: You can fool some of the people ……..

  4. James George says:

    Was that an anonymous decision or was it a split decision?Like the Querari Viking objection

    1. Editor says:

      Who knows, James?

  5. My Frankel says:

    As the poster Steve has implied, we have seen this movie before. It is nothing new. It keeps on playing over and over again. The only people who can stop the show are the owners who belong to the Racing Association. They can easily get enough signatures together to call a general meeting to remove the dinosaur as a member of the organisation. A while ago someone commented that we should not be pointing fingers at the dinosaur, we should be looking down and frowning on the Racing Association members for keeping him in his position. I think it’s the best advice.

  6. logan naidoo says:

    Thulani who,,,,,

Leave a Comment

‹ Previous

Don’t Beat About The Bush!

Next ›

Tara Laing (photo: Pauline Herman)

Tara’s Travel Guide To Winning

Popular Posts