Home » Racing & Sport » No Crop Ban!

No Crop Ban!

'Hitting racehorses' not acceptable

The British Horseracing Authority has rejected the prospects of a whip ban in racing.

Respected journalist Matthew Syed said in his column in The Times newspaper that the racing industry was “in denial” and that “pain is being inflicted upon animals for the purpose of making them run faster”.

He added: “It is in the interests not only of horses but of racing itself to consign the use of this device for the purposes of increasing speed to the scrapheap of history.”

Responding on Twitter, the BHA said: “If horses behaved as if they were in pain, then the millions of people who watch the sport – and the thousands who take part and dedicate their lives to the care of these animals – wouldn’t accept it.

“They would be horrified. In fact, our trainers, riders and owners are knowledgeable and compassionate and the last thing they want to do is see their horses hurt.

“The whip is foam-padded and air-cushioned and we have very strict rules which limit the amount of times which the whip can be used, and jockeys who care about the horses they ride.”

It added: “We are aware that a debate is ongoing about the use of the whip and the BHA is following the wide range of views very closely.”

However, while many in racing aligned themselves to the BHA’s viewpoint, former Channel 4 pundit John McCririck has long been an advocate of banning jockeys from hitting horses with the whip.

“It is appalling there are people still prepared in this country to stand up for hitting racehorses,” McCririck told Press Association Sport.

“No other living creature are you legally allowed to hit, so what on earth are we doing?”

  • Racing UK

Have Your Say

Comments Policy
The Sporting Post encourages allcomers to feel free to have their say in the spirit of enlightening the topic, the participants and the originator of the thread. However, if it is deemed to be either offensive, insulting, personal, false or possibly unsubstantiated, the Sporting Post shall, on it's own assessment, alter or remove comments.

The use of pseudonyms is permitted by posters to afford everybody the equal opportunity to inform or express ideas, on condition that the content of any post does not infringe upon any aspect, stated or implied, of the Sporting Post's advertised public comments policy.

It should be expressly noted that the views expressed by posters are not necessarily those of the Sporting Post.

5 comments on “No Crop Ban!

  1. Ian Jayes says:

    It is worth remembering that spurs were banned only about fifty years ago and there was some opposition to that. The use of spurs today would be roundly condemned.

  2. LG says:

    I have watched racing for many years and noted that horses react to the whip. How racing will provide maximum performance for the punter without s whip i dont know. The use should be limited and enforced. Not banned.

  3. Mj says:

    Whip is a means of keeping a horses mind on its job. S
    ome pundits can be wrong.

    Mj Werde

  4. Ashleigh says:

    Mr Jayes, spurs are still permitted in Australian racing:

    AR.88. Riders may use spurs provided they are blunt and of a type approved by the Stewards.

    In Japan they can be used with special permission:

    Art. 95 A jockey must not ride in a race using spurs. Provided, however, this shall not apply in the event the Steward of the Meeting deems there is a compelling reason.

  5. Ian Jayes says:

    I’m not surprised, Australia allows racing that makes horses run like camels. They were also the biggest producers of anabolic steroids and other drugs used in horseracing. Given their WWII treatment of prisoners the Japanese are also not to be used as a measure of humaneness. Horses are sensitive animals and should not be hurt in any way.

Leave a Comment

‹ Previous

Kenilworth Racecourse

Rush Of Blood To The Head

Next ›

All The King’s Men

Popular Posts