Home » Racing & Sport » Can They Really Justify It?

Can They Really Justify It?

2018 Triple Crown winner under cloud

Justify won the 2018 Triple Crown after a failed post-race drug test at a California track that could have kept the horse out of the Kentucky Derby, according to a report in the New York Times.

The newspaper reported on Wednesday that Bob Baffert-trained Justify tested positive for the drug scopolamine after winning the Santa Anita Derby, one of the final prep races for the Kentucky Derby. Justify went on to win the Derby and took the Preakness and Belmont stakes to complete the Triple Crown, becoming just the 13th horse to do so in history.

The Times said instead of a speedy disqualification, the California Horse Racing Board took more than a month to confirm the results. The newspaper also reported that instead of filing a public complaint, the board made decisions behind closed doors as it moved to drop the case and lighten the penalty for horses found to have scopolamine in their systems.

The newspaper said test results, emails and internal memorandums show how California regulators waited nearly three weeks, until the Kentucky Derby was only nine days away, to notify Baffert of the positive test. Then, two months after the Belmont victory, the board disposed of the inquiry altogether during a closed-door executive session.

“We take seriously the integrity of horse racing in California and are committed to implementing the highest standards of safety and accountability for all horses, jockeys and participants,” the California Horse Racing Board said in a statement.

A CHRB spokesman said the organization would have a further statement on Thursday.

Baffert is yet to respond to requests for comment on the story.


Have Your Say

Comments Policy
The Sporting Post encourages everyone to feel free to comment in the spirit of enlightening the topic being discussed, to add opinions or correct errors. All posts are accepted on the condition that The Sporting Post can at any time alter, correct or remove comments, either partially or entirely.

All posters are required to post under their real and verified names, you can adjust your display name on your account page or to send corrections privately to the Editor. The Sporting Post will not publish comments submitted anonymously or under pseudonyms.

The views of any individuals that are published are NOT necessarily the views of The Sporting Post.

3 comments on “Can They Really Justify It?

  1. Chris Swart says:

    Smoking gun again

    Keywords and horses and you’ll find bedding and feed contamination.
    There isn’t a reason why Baffert would use a drug like this on the most physically imposing horse we’ve ever assessed

    People are very quick to make assumption based on selling news rather than plain fact

    Clearly the stewards made the best decision based on those facts and not called it like ours did

    1. karel says:

      What about transparency in decision making?

  2. gavin says:

    sour grapes … he is a champion ..he could have won on 3 legs

Leave a Comment

‹ Previous

Pre-Race Bloods – Do They Impact?

Next ›

TAB Changes PA Dividend

Popular Posts