Home » Racing & Sport » Challenge To Handicappers – Horse Care Could Benefit

Challenge To Handicappers – Horse Care Could Benefit

Steve Reid throws down the gauntlet

They say that when it comes to politics and handicapping there is a professor in every one-horse town. And while the horse is often grey, it can also be black or white.

Here’s an instance where veteran racing man and seasoned Sporting Post commentator Steve Reid throws down the gauntlet to our Men In Black at the NHRA.

“I’ll pay R20,000 penance if I’m wrong,” says Reid. In a world where BS walks and money talks – those are fighting words.

The story begins on 26 July 2019 when WORLD RADAR jumped out for the first time with 13 others, mostly unraced and only two who had run more than twice.  WORLD RADAR won by nearly 7 L and was rated, with shock and horror headlines, a bold (105).

More than a few were incredulous that a filly, in PE, could be rated 105 after one start.

Fast forward to 26 September 2020 and an unusual race. A colt on debut, PUERTO MANZANO(ARG) dead – heated with THUMBS UP (93), a well travelled and somewhat busy 3yo filly.

She left Cape Town pre-lockdown after her third start finishing 2.4 L to ERIK THE RED.  Prior to her dead-heat race, THUMBS UP (then 86) ran 4th in the Gr2 Debutante, sandwiched between a (94) and a (nett 101) and emerged (93), adjusted up by 3.5kgs.

Unknown PUERTO MANZANO (ARG) drifted from 9/1 to 18/1 and experienced THUMBS UP (93) shortened from 6/10 to 4/10.  It’s fair to say that the dead-heat was a shock result.Perhaps more so as the two are stable companions, sharing trainer and owners.

Anyone interested in ratings would realize that PUERTO MANZANO (ARG) had just found himself in a handicapping pickle, because the dead-heat is the handicappers goal, it eliminates all calculations as to what a length may or may not mean.

It was clear that if THUMBS UP (93) was going to be the line horse, then the Argentinian stable mate was 93 + 2.5kgs = 98. End of story, as they say in the High Court.

Always expect the unexpected.

An online debate burst forth.

The handicapper had some options, but published an outcome no one expected, and one where no one could join the dots.

PUERTO 92, not 98?  If 92, why is THUMBS not 87?  Why is THUMBS 90, and PUERTO not the 95?

What is FLYING CARPET then, off PUERTO or THUMBS?  A week later FLYING CARPET runs another 6 L off, and makes that winner 94.  Wow!  Please, let’s leave those 4yo’s out of this for now!

From the outset Steve Reid, who has proven on talk shows recently to have more than a academic passing knowledge of the workings and mechanics of the NHRA – his intimate grasp surely outstrips a board member or two  – revealed his immediate misgivings, with the NHRA ignoring all debate from the faithful for a full 3 weeks:

Steve shot off a message to the Uber handicapper at 14h12 the same day, and said the following, verbatim:

SR:” Hello Mr Moodley, I’m looking forward to your handicappers assessment of the 1st race today. All I’m going to say is remember World Radar. My call is the line horse has to be the filly and thus the debutant gets a 98 for sharing a race. Nice,”

At 14h34 he received the following response from Mr Moodley via SMS.

VM: “Dear Mr Reid. I have rated the race….. the Handicappers shall finalize on Monday. I have much lower than your assessment…. as for World Radar, I shall disagree with your comments in it’s entirety”.

Reid then responded immediately .

SR” Lol. You need the blinkers removed”.

The reason we are listing this conversation is to show that Moodley, and hence by default Handicapper Mr Maharaj, were very aware of the implications of this dead heat.

They then chose to ignore basic handicapping guidelines and made two cardinal errors.

  • The first was to lower the line horse
  • The second was not allocating the full weight difference to the colts rating

The weight difference is acknowledged but only 1kg of the 2,5kg difference is allotted.

The question now must be – why did they do this? Reid says he believes the saying “pride comes before the fall” is very relevant here.

Sending out a message about who is in charge seems to have trumped common sense and handicapping basics.

Perceived infallibility is a dangerous thing when the facts prove otherwise.

“I am so sure of what I allege that I issue these gentlemen a challenge. Give me a rational and logical explanation to justify your nonsense assessment of the race. Use only accepted handicapping guidelines and not protectionist rules. If you do this successfully, l will issue a public apology and never criticise the NHRA in any regard again!”

Reid says that he will also make a R20 000 donation to the Highveld Horse Care Unit as a penance.

What odds deathly silence follows?

Read the thread that started it all – click here

Have Your Say

Comments Policy
The Sporting Post encourages everyone to feel free to comment in the spirit of enlightening the topic being discussed, to add opinions or correct errors. All posts are accepted on the condition that The Sporting Post can at any time alter, correct or remove comments, either partially or entirely.

All posters are required to post under their real and verified names, you can adjust your display name on your account page or to send corrections privately to the Editor. The Sporting Post will not publish comments submitted anonymously or under pseudonyms.

The views of any individuals that are published are NOT necessarily the views of The Sporting Post.

15 comments on “Challenge To Handicappers – Horse Care Could Benefit

  1. Jonathan Harris says:

    Ed.Although some if my sentiments were highlighted, that was not my quote. Steve Reid should be credited for it.

    1. Editor says:

      Hi Jonathan
      Thanks – as discussed we have adjusted the quote
      Regards

  2. Pieta Louw. says:

    Cecil, weer eens, ek like die Steve Reid se brits…..die ou maak sense……maar wat is die kanse dat die silver suits hom kan antwoord?…..glo nie……

  3. Cecil Pienaar says:

    Hello Pieta, nee wat, ou Steve het goeie bedoelings maar ek reken daai 20,000 is safe. Ja Nee kyk, die man gooi hoog Engels, wed jou Hy Kan goed Afr ook praat.
    Nice (fair) Challenge for a good cause.
    Lekker Aand

  4. Pieta Louw. says:

    Ja ou Steve kan ook lekker Afrikaans gebruik…..maar hy is daai ou wat sommer die 20k sal donate in any racing cause…..hy doen dit al vir Jare…..
    Maar hy maak goeie punte wat die blink suits nie kan challenge nie.

    Nou klink ek soos sy agent….😇😇

  5. Pieta Louw. says:

    Ja miskien kan ons hom vra om iets in Afrikaaans te se….😀😀

  6. Jess Kyriacou says:

    Does this mean that if Vee Moodley cannot give a logical and rational explanation to justify his assessment of the race that he will reciprocate and offer an apology and donate R20 000 to the Highveld Horse Care Unit ?

  7. Asgar Essack says:

    Well done Steve, you got them Stone Cold.
    Your money is safe as houses these guys are too Chicken to challenge you.
    I wonder if some great Statistician can help them out with this one.
    Only time will tell.

  8. M(artin)Gram(atica) says:

    Where is the integrity in the system if what Reid alleges is true? The ratings appear to have been manually meddled with. This incessant interfering with the system by individuals is the biggest reason this MR system fails. Could we please ask for the official version from the handicappers please?

    The racing bush telegraph is awash with rumours that Mr Werners resigned from the NHRA board due to this race. Apparently there has been an inquiry opened regarding the ride given by Chase Maujean on Puerto Manzano. There is nothing on the NHRA website in this regard. Could we maybe also assertain if this is accurate?

    What a mess!

    1. Editor says:

      The Stipes reported:
      Notwithstanding the fact that PUERTO MANZANO (ARG) dead heated, the Board questioned Jockey C Maujean with regards to his ride with particular attention paid to his vigour from the 400m to the 200m. Mr Maujean explained to the Board that PUERTO MANZANO (ARG) is a big heavy-set gelding who raced green and was clumsy, in that he seemed to lose his footing behind on a number of occasions around the turn and into the straight. Mr Maujean further added that because of these factors, he did his best to keep him as balanced as possible before riding him out to the finish. The Board have adjourned to give further consideration to this matter.

  9. Cecil Pienaar says:

    Hello Pieta, die woord gobbledegook hierbo, ek moes dit opsoek en lyk my in Afr is dit – k🤣k praat.

    I was so hoping this challenge would be accepted.

  10. Pieta Louw. says:

    Sorry vir die laat reply.Cecil…..Meneer Ed het my eerste reply terug gehou….
    Moes gewees het “tied up in knots” en nie “naaied up in tots” nie.

  11. Cecil Pienaar says:

    🤣 More Pieta. Ja auto spell en Afr boonop, ekt skoonma ophou text verjaardae en kersfees, na woorde ‘verkeerd’ uitgekom het soos draak, koei 🤭

    Steve, Mnr, seems Moodley is unaware of the challenge. Pls sms him again.

    Have a Good weekend

  12. Graham Hurlstone-Jones says:

    They are after there jock because he was not meant to dead heat……that is the investigation….No trust from the punters….none.

  13. Donald Bradshaw says:

    Graham , if you state the ” jockey was not meant to dead heat ” then please state what the jockey ” was meant to do ” so that your point can be understood ?

Leave a Comment

‹ Previous

She Looks Really Royal

Next ›

Wednesday Racing Menu

Popular Posts