Quick Links:

Bill Has Dire Repercussions For KZN Racing

'Make your voices heard' - Belinda Scott

After the hardships the province faced last year, including the unrest in July and the Covid-19 variants that have decimated the tourism industry, KwaZulu-Natal  simply cannot afford the heavy financial toll of the racing industry’s collapse.

This warning was issued on Wednesday in a communication to Gold Circle Members by Chairperson Belinda Scott in reference to a recently published bill which she says ‘is of great concern to Gold Circle and to the horseracing industry at large’.

The Gaming and Betting Tax Amendment Bill was introduced in the KwaZulu Natal provincial legislature on 10 December 2021, and was subsequently published in the Provincial Gazette on 7 January 2022.

Student S’busiswe Dube presented a matching pair of outfits at the first round of judging of the Vodacom Durban July Young Designer Award

Since the Bill includes provisions with potentially ruinous consequences for the industry, Mrs Scot said she thought it important to ensure that Gold Circle members are aware of it, and the magnitude of the threat it poses.

Since 1976, the racing operators have received from or via bookmakers, a contribution to the costs incurred by the racing operators in staging racing and providing racing product for fixed odds betting.

This has been a part of our law for decades, and most recently finds itself encapsulated in the provisions of the KwaZulu-Natal Gaming and Betting Tax Act.

In short, winning punters of fixed odds bets pay a tax of 6% of the winnings to the provincial fiscus and, in turn, half of that (3%) is paid by the fiscus to Gold Circle as a contribution to the cost of staging the Sport in KwaZulu-Natal.

The July is a massive economic boost for the province (Pic – Chase Liebenberg)

The new Gaming and Betting Tax Amendment Bill, which was initially published on 29 November 2021, seeks to remove Gold Circle’s right to receive this 3%.

The new Bill provides that 1.4% (just under half of the contribution) will be diverted to the ‘Transformation Fund’, which will be under the control of the KZN Gaming & Betting Board. In relation to the remaining 1.6%, Gold Circle will have the right to apply for all of, or some of that amount, for the purpose of ‘development’  and ‘transformation’, provided it complies with a series of conditions which the KwaZulu-Natal Gaming and Betting Board may wish to impose from time to time.

Mrs Scott suggests that this proposal would at least (nearly) halve the contribution paid to Gold Circle (although it could just as well completely delete the contribution), and thus poses an existential threat to the industry as this funding subsidises the significant costs that racecourse operators incur to keep the industry alive.

If enacted, the Bill would also have far-reaching consequences for employment in the sector and the province. The economic participants whose livelihoods depend on the industry include workers at the racecourse, training facilities, racehorse breeders and trainers, the Coastal Horse Care Unit, the South African Jockey Academy, horse feed manufacturers, veterinarians, farriers, grooms, jockeys, horse transporters, totalisator staff and downstream leisure horse grooms amongst others.

Of particular cultural and economic concern is the fate of the Durban July should the proposal be enacted. The Durban July is the premier racing event in the country, the largest horseracing event in Africa, and an institution in KwaZulu Natal.

It brings visitors to the province to the benefit of the accommodation, transport, entertainment, and fashion industries. The Economic Impact Assessment of the 2019 event showed a contribution of R288 million to the Municipality’s Gross Domestic Product.

In a shocking observation, the current Bill could make the continued hosting of the event by Gold Circle financially unfeasible.

After the hardships the province faced last year, including the unrest in July and the Covid-19 variants that have decimated the tourism industry, the province simply cannot afford the heavy financial toll of the industry’s collapse.

It is all the more concerning that the Bill was already published once before irregularly and with insufficient time for public comment. So grave was the initial procedural deficiency that the Bill was withdrawn, pursuant to representations made by Gold Circle to the Secretary of the KwaZulu-Natal Legislature. This was a hopeful sign for the industry until the Bill was republished on 7 January 2022.

The new deadline for public comment is 6 February 2022. Once this window closes, the Bill will be debated in the legislature and voted on.

While the debate process in the portfolio committee will present more opportunities for input on the Bill, including the possibility of public hearings , Mrs Scott says ‘we cannot be complacent’.

Gold Circle has already communicated its concerns about the Bill to the Secretary of the KwaZulu- Natal legislature as well as the KwaZulu-Natal provincial treasury, and is currently preparing its official legal submission on the Bill. The company will remain engaged throughout the legislative process to try and help ensure that the Bill’s more calamitous provisions are not enacted.

“We strongly encourage our members to make their voices heard on this matter as well,” says Mrs Scott.

Gold Circle respects any good intentions of a government, but this Bill in its current form can only contribute to the province’s already substantial unemployment rate, recently worsened by the July unrest.

For the sake of the thousands of people employed by the industry – and the horserace lovers who have supported the Durban July over its 125-year history and the Industry at large – this Bill simply cannot be allowed to pass in its current form.

Please read more – click on the cover of the SPRINT below:


Have Your Say - *Please Use Your Name & Surname*

Comments Policy
The Sporting Post encourages readers to comment in the spirit of enlightening the topic being discussed, to add opinions or correct errors. All posts are accepted on the condition that the Sporting Post can at any time alter, correct or remove comments, either partially or entirely.

All posters are required to post under their actual name and surname - no anonymous posts or use of pseudonyms will be accepted. You can adjust your display name on your account page or to send corrections privately to the Editor. The Sporting Post will not publish comments submitted anonymously or under pseudonyms.

Please note that the views that are published are not necessarily those of the Sporting Post.

13 comments on “Bill Has Dire Repercussions For KZN Racing

  1. Kenny Masilela says:

    Why would a punter deposit his cash on the tote, this Met week, when he can get an extra 15% with Hollywood? At this pace it will take a miracle to revive the tote.

  2. Neill de Bruyn says:

    The bookmakers probably view one another as more serious competition than the tote, due to their enormous slice of the cake.

  3. Steve Reid says:

    David you miss my point entirely.

    The money that Gold Circle receives from government comes from punters paying a 6% tax on their winning bets with bookmakers. Half of that 6% is then given back to Gold Circle. So in essence bookmakers become tax collectors on behalf of government who then reward the bookmakers competition ( Gold Circle the tote ) with 50% of the monies collected. I repeat my question – where in the world has any industry been used as tax collectors to assist their competition?

    This has nothing to do with bookmakers contributing towards infrastructure costs, that is a completely different issue.

  4. David Thiselton says:

    Referring to Steve Reid’s statement “Where in the world has any industry been used as tax collectors to assist their competition?”.
    I am not sure if I am misinterpreting your statement but surely in most if not all places in the world there must be compensation from bookmakers who are betting on a horseracing product whose infrastructure is being funded by another entity.
    E.g the bookmakers levy to horseracing in the UK, in Victoria Australia there is a levy system too and sure there must be something similar in all countries?

  5. Donald Bradshaw says:

    ‘” Dire repercussions for Gold Circle ” there will certainly be if they do not get their product to be broadcast on DSTV , that is for sure !

    That ” halwe brood ” may soon only be ” geen / niks brood ” if they do not sort that crucial matter out ?

  6. Cecil Pienaar says:

    Naand Se Steve, ja stem saam, ou Belinda is of was n prominent Politician here in The Kingdom of the Zulu.

    Ware woorde, die halwe brood,, spot on.

    Good Night

  7. Steve Reid says:

    Cry me a river Gold Circle.

    Punters fund the tax 100%. This tax is then split between province and Gold Circle. Gold Circle then receive 3%. Where in the world has any industry been used as tax collectors to assist their competition? The reality is that the majority of punters who play with bookmakers were probably tote punters before the open bet was introduced. The real question to be asked is why these punters migrated away from the tote to the bookmakers? The obvious target that both operators should have is to regain lost tote business from the bookmakers. There is only one way that’s going to happen and I have been saying this for years – do a deal with the bookmakers and forfeit the ridiculous margins you current enjoy. There’s a saying in afrikaans that doesnt translate as well as it should – ‘n Halwe brood is beter as niks ( greetings to the Albert Falls major )

    Scott is a former MEC in the KZN Provincial legislature. Its time for her to work those ex comrades and sing for her supper.

  8. Cecil Pienaar says:

    Morning William ????…

    I still want to see Banyana taking on Bafana… maybe a small handicap, allow the men an extra player

    Albert (soon) Falls Greetings. 94% ↗️

  9. Jerome Pillay says:

    Extreme ataganism.
    Two directions in opposite is no good at all.


    What puzzles me about ‘The Ball’ is that The Comores, world champion snorkelers, made it to the AFRICA CUP OF NATIONS football finals and Bafana Bafana nothing ?

  11. Neill de Bruyn says:

    The provincial Gaming Boards receive tax from the bookmakers, as well as from the racing operators, on pool bettng. The racing operators are also subject to corporate tax, I think.
    If the racing operator (in this case GC) is affected negatively by the loss of the 3% levy, that could for example result in less race meetings, with less horses, reduced stakes, less owners, etc, which in turn would surely result in less tax for the province (domino effect). But the province seems prepared to take that chance in order to advance transformation and development. One has one’s doubts about anything that the ruling party intends and actually executes, though.
    Transformation is the new buzzword in racing, and Phumulela did not do especially well with their efforts in this regard in the past either, so changes are inevitable.
    A pragmatic approach with the 3% levy being phased out over a number of years could be an alternative solution.

  12. “repercussions”. Sorry to be a pedant.

    1. Editor says:

      No problem Brendan

Leave a Comment



Popular Posts

Related Posts

Gavin van Zyl (photo: hamishNIVENPhotography)
Horse Racing

More KZN Trainers To Trial

Van Zyl said besides the trial allowing the public a chance to watch unraced horses it was also a very good part of a horse’s preparation for racing

Read More »

A Winter Damascus Moment

’This son of Master Of My Fate has now won the first two legs of the Winter Series – congrats all round. I wouldn’t be surprised if Master Of My Fate makes champion sire this year’

Read More »