Hello,I have written previously without the courtesy of a reply. I shall try again.
Is colateral form going to be included in this new format? That feature was Sporting Post’s USP and I find it amazing that you have chosen to exclude it thus far without a reason or explanation.
The question will be, does Computaform now afford a better study of form or not.
Whilst the articles are commendable in their limited appeal, surely the race card, form and issues directly concerning the forthcoming meeting are of prime concern to the average reader/punter.
I have been involved in racing for 30 years and owned a fair number of horses. I know the punter has a very limited interest in bloodlines, history and owner and trainer banter. Even the students of form have a limited interest in breeding and bloodline. I am not suggesting these aspects are done away with but I would think there should be a structure of priorities.
The new format is an improvement generally but its too busy, complicated and, obviously still experiencing problems. When these are sorted, I trust the colateral Form will return??
Tony de Villiers – via email
