Positive Shock: Kotzen Implements Further Controls

Has right of appeal against finding and penalty

A watershed first- time positive in South African racing history has shocked trainer Glen Kotzen, as the drug is not a veterinary product used in horses, but a human pain killer.

The National Horseracing Authority confirmed via a media release on Monday that at an Inquiry held at its offices in Cape Town on 11 June 2019 which was concluded on 21 November 2020,  that Kotzen was charged with a contravention of Rule 73.2.4.

Disappointed  but boxing on – Glen Kotzen (Pic – Candiese Lenferna)

The particulars being that he was the Trainer and the person responsible for Herodotus, which ran in and won the 6th race at Kenilworth Racecourse on 30 October 2018.

A urine specimen which was taken from this horse disclosed, upon analysis, the presence of O-Desmethyltramadol  which is a prohibited substance in terms of the Rules of the NHRA. Kotzen pleaded not guilty to the charge, but was found guilty of the charge.

In arriving at a suitable penalty, the Inquiry Board took into consideration all mitigating factors and as this was a first offence, imposed a fine of R35 000.

Furthermore, in terms of Rule 72.3.2, Herodotus is disqualified from the said race and the provisions of Rule 67.7.8 shall apply.

Mr Kotzen has the Right of Appeal against both the finding and the penalty.

“I have taken it upon myself to investigate the contamination from water sources, environmental factors and human contamination and employed some of the best forensic experts both here and abroad. With thorough investigation together with the SAPS, wife Kathi and I  found three staff members with IOD injuries in and around the time of Herodotus’s win that were taking the medication – which we have since learnt is routinely given to IOD patients who have undergone surgeries,” said Glen Kotzen.

The veteran trainer says that since this incident every employee has to sign a  basic conditions of employment contract, which includes declaring  and advising them of any schedule medication they are taking.

“We have also put up signage in our yard forbidding urination in and around our stable yard, together with  general hand sanitization.  Worldwide we have learnt that most O-Desmethyltramadol cases were human or environmental contamination.”

The Sporting Post is aware that In the UK, Richard Hannon received many positives over many years for the same product and he was eventually pulling his hair out at not being able to find the source.

Read more here about Hannon’s case

This case once again highlights the strict liability rule in this country, which automatically renders the trainer of the horse that tested positive liable to a prohibitive substance.

In most major racing jurisdictions around the globe, if the trainer can prove that he took all reasonable precautions to prevent the positive finding, then a finding is not made against him.

Tramadol is a class 2 prohibited substance which carries a penalty of between R69 000 and R115 000 for a first offence. Kotzen’s substantially lesser penalty of R35 000 is an indication that the inquiry board accepted that there were extreme mitigating factors in this case.

“Whilst we respect the role the NHRA plays in protecting our industry and know the value of their service, it is very sad that the strict liability clause ultimately makes me a guilty party and has caused our family tremendous emotional turmoil – let alone the enormous financial losses we have incurred.  If a trainer abroad can prove that he took all reasonable precautions to prevent a positive, then the authorities won’t make a finding against the trainer concerned. I will request the review board to look at the finding with regards to my case,” concluded Kotzen, who also thanked the owners of Herodotus who had stood behind them while they investigated the cause of the contamination.

Have Your Say - *Please Use Your Name & Surname

Comments Policy
The Sporting Post encourages readers to comment in the spirit of enlightening the topic being discussed, to add opinions or correct errors. All posts are accepted on the condition that the Sporting Post can at any time alter, correct or remove comments, either partially or entirely.

All posters are required to post under their actual name and surname – no anonymous posts or use of pseudonyms will be accepted. You can adjust your display name on your account page or to send corrections privately to the EditorThe Sporting Post will not publish comments submitted anonymously or under pseudonyms.

Please note that the views that are published are not necessarily those of the Sporting Post.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Share:

Facebook
WhatsApp
Twitter

Popular Posts