The Bulls And SA Rugby To Explain

Euro bosses unhappy

The Bulls and SA Rugby must reportedly give Euro bosses an explanation for why the Pretoria outfit fielded a weakened side in their Champions Cup quarter-final.

European Professional Club Rugby (EPCR) want answers as to why the Bulls did not pick 11 of their frontline players for the trip to England to face Northampton Saints after Jake White made mass changes to the team that won the round-of-16 clash at home.

Northampton Saints vs Vodacom Bulls (Pic – Morgan Treacy/INPHO/Shutterstock)

The selection immediately resulted in backlash with many believing that the Bulls are prioritising the United Rugby Championship, with a win over Munster next weekend enough to secure a home play-off.

The decision ultimately backfired with the Bulls on the receiving end of a 59-22 hiding at the hands of the Premiership-leading Saints.

According to the Rapport, who reported that a letter had been sent by EPCR, the Bulls are not worried about explaining their selections based on the medical evidence they have available.

As per the same report, an insider underlined that it would be very risky to send a player who is not certain to recover in time all the way to England. The insider further explains that Marcell Coetzee is out for five months while Rugby World Cup winner Marco van Staden is also sidelined with an injury.

The source went on to outline the quality of rising loose forwards Mpilo Gumede and Cameron Hanekom, both of whom started the clash against Saints, and insisted if the Bulls did not care about the Champions Cup they would not have fielded the duo.

A local rugby boss told the Rapport that incidents like this could contribute to South African teams eventually being removed from European competition.

Perhaps the situation is magnified by White’s ongoing comments about the travel situation for the Bulls where he called out SARU after the round-of-16 clash for not having organised their arrangements to travel north.

The governing body responded later in the week with a detailed statement about their travels including the whopping R4.1 million rand cost to SA Rugby. This, in turn, fuelled the selection backlash when the weakened side was revealed.

Have Your Say - *Please Use Your Name & Surname

Comments Policy
The Sporting Post encourages readers to comment in the spirit of enlightening the topic being discussed, to add opinions or correct errors. All posts are accepted on the condition that the Sporting Post can at any time alter, correct or remove comments, either partially or entirely.

All posters are required to post under their actual name and surname – no anonymous posts or use of pseudonyms will be accepted. You can adjust your display name on your account page or to send corrections privately to the EditorThe Sporting Post will not publish comments submitted anonymously or under pseudonyms.

Please note that the views that are published are not necessarily those of the Sporting Post.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments



Popular Posts

From Chaos To Reform

Charl Pretorius writes in his Off The Record column on the 4Racing website that owners, trainers and racing fans are gravely concerned about the state of our industry

Read More »